top of page

Research

We used a variety of research methods to inspire our design. These include conducting interviews, building an affinity wall, reviewing related literature and analyzing comparable systems.

We analyzed our data using an affinity wall
Interviews & Analysis

 

We interviewed potential users of our system to learn about their goals and understand the current rehabilitation process. 

  • 5 current and former patients discussed the personal experiences in rehab

  • 2 physical therapists walked us through the rehab process

  • 2 movement researchers explained current attitudes and trends in the field

 

We analyzed our interview data by buliding an affinity wall

Literature Review
Literature Review & Competitive Analysis

 

We reviewed industry reports and academic literature to assess:

  • The current strengths and weaknesses of motion-sensing technology

  • The process of physical rehabilitation and where improvements could be made

  • Exercise standards in rehabilitation

  • How to motivate patients to complete exercises at home

  • How to provide meaningful feedback and positive reinforcement

  • The successes and failures of comparable technology solutions

Learnings

 

Our analysis motivated several key design decisions:

  • Patients should strive for salient, not virtual, rewards

  • Patients should receive continuous feedback from the system to they can understand if they are doing the exercises correctly and if they are making progress

  • Patients and therapists should be able to easily see progress against key milestones

  • Data should be easily accessible, understandable at-a-glance, and useful for making treatment decisions

bottom of page